logologo_light
SIGN-UP
  • HOW IT WORKS
    • SRA Home
    • SRA Learner & SRA Coach
    • SRA Course Content
    • SRA Chrome Extension
  • PRICING
    • SRA Pricing
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • BLOG
    • The Savage Truth Blog
  • PARTNERS
    • Savage Partners
  • BOOKS
    • Recruit The Savage Way
    • The Savage Truth Book
  • FREE RESOURCES
    • Free Video – Behaviour & Activity
    • Free Video – Selling Is Listening
    • E-Book – AI In Recruitment
    • E-Book – Scale Up A Business
    • E-Book – Kpis & Performance
    • E-Book – Fill More Roles
    • E-Book – Starting A Business
    • E-Book – Successful M&A
  • SIGN-IN
    • Sign-In – Existing
    • Sign-Up – New
  • HOW IT WORKS
    • SRA Home
    • SRA Learner & SRA Coach
    • SRA Course Content
    • SRA Chrome Extension
  • PRICING
    • SRA Pricing
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • BLOG
    • The Savage Truth Blog
  • PARTNERS
    • Savage Partners
  • BOOKS
    • Recruit The Savage Way
    • The Savage Truth Book
  • FREE RESOURCES
    • Free Video – Behaviour & Activity
    • Free Video – Selling Is Listening
    • E-Book – AI In Recruitment
    • E-Book – Scale Up A Business
    • E-Book – Kpis & Performance
    • E-Book – Fill More Roles
    • E-Book – Starting A Business
    • E-Book – Successful M&A
  • SIGN-IN
    • Sign-In – Existing
    • Sign-Up – New

Another loudmouth ‘recruiter-hater’ falls from grace

I take zero pleasure when someone fails in business.

I know too well the risk, stress and hard work it takes to start and build a business, and admire anyone who tries, regardless of the outcome.

However it’s always important to be humble as you go about your work, focusing on what you can do better, and never, ever bagging your competition. That’s ugly, and can so often come back to haunt you.

And so it was that I cringed a few years ago when Gen George, the 22-year-old founder of online job marketplace OneShift, in a moment of early success and embarrassing hubris said the following;

“The recruitment industry is broken. It’s completely exploitative, and is responsible for huge amounts of dissatisfaction on both sides of the employment equation – jobseekers and employers.

If you’re still using big recruiters to find your talent, you’re relying on an outdated, needlessly expensive and ineffective process. Stop wasting your money.”

This outburst was covered in detail by Ross Clennett.

When she offered those opinions, Ms. George had just received a $5 M injection from Programmed for 27.5% of her company, a move that would have delighted her no doubt, but bemused me, as I could see nothing about One Shift that solved any problem that needed solving.

It partially prompted this post from me, which pointed out why so many hysterical HR tech startups were destined to fail, and indeed, have done so in many cases, including this one.

So it came as no surprise to me this week when the news leaked out that Gen George has been stood down as CEO of her own company (circumstances are not clear, but this does not happen when things are going well), and even more tellingly, Programmed have had to assume 100% ownership of OneShift, while at the same time writing down the value of its investment in One Shift with an impairment charge of 2.1 M.

The One Shift development follows hard on the news that Search Party Group managing director and chief executive officer, Ben Hutt has resigned. As recently as October 2016, Search Party predicted ‘accelerating growth’, and forecast annual gross revenue to reach $450 million ‘within 2 to 3 years’. Search Party  subsequently announced in April 2017, that they have ‘suspended any marketing and customer focused activities, and any further revenue is expected to be minimal for the foreseeable future’. Newly appointed Interim CEO Josh Rogers admitted that The Search Party ‘tried to do everything for everyone‘, and has not been sufficiently clear on the areas where it can add value for the relevant stakeholders. According to Shortlist, the bio of Ben Hutt on the company website advises that Hutt raised more than $14.7m in investments throughout his tenure. This money is presumably lost or at best the value severely denuded. ( I could not find this bio on the site, which is unsurprising as he has now left).

Meanwhile, pretty much every large recruitment company, required to report financial results, are declaring significant growth in revenue and profits, a trend reflected in the accounts of just about every one of the 14 small to medium sized recruitment companies where I have a seat on the Advisory Board.

The global agency recruitment industry is now worth almost USD $ 500 Billion and is growing at 6.8% a year (Source: Staffing Industry Analysts and Ciett). I see no reason to adjust my feeling about the industry that was backed up by hard data here.

I am sure technology will impact recruitment significantly and soon. Sourcing, screening, matching, candidate assessment will all be fundamentally changed by big data and AI. And we can expect chatbots to reinvent the candidate experience too.

A ‘ big bang’ that disrupts recruitment entirely however, is harder to envisage anytime soon.

Gen George will no doubt learn from this experience, and hopefully go on to great success in some other arena, treading carefully, and respectfully, as she goes.

**********************************************************************************************************************

SavageSprint is coming to the UK. Last tour was SOLD OUT and many missed out on attending. Sign up now. London, Manchester, Glasgow

Savage Growth for Owner/ Managers is coming to London too. Sign up here

New! Savage Truth Masterclasses South Africa! Cape Town and Johannesburg. Sign up now

*********************************************************************************************************************

Image courtesy of Joe the Goat Farmer

  • Posted by Greg Savage
  • On June 6, 2017
  • 24 Comments
Tags: hr tech, Leadership, Manners, recruitment, Recruitment Trends

24 Comments

Anonymous
  • Jun 6 2017
  • Reply
I note that Gen George runs a networking group called "Like Minded Bitches Drinking Wine (LMBDW)" at which I am sure you are no longer welcome. LOL
    SHeryll
    • Jun 6 2017
    • Reply
    Your email made my day. "Like Minded Bitches Drinking Wine" would love to be a fly on the wall if Greg did get invited
Nigel
  • Jun 6 2017
  • Reply
In fairness if Gen had been treading carefully and respectfully I doubt she would have created a $18.2m business at the age of 22. If anyone needs to be more respectful I would suggest it's the Programmed senior management team who paid out $5m for a minority stake of a unproven start-up run by an inexperienced leader.
    Greg Savage
    • Jun 6 2017
    • Reply
    All views welcome of course Nigel but I could scarcely disagree more. I can name 15 tech start-ups and a 1,000 other companies that are far more successful and have managed it without denigrating, insulting or demeaning anyone along the way. I don't deny anyone their right to passion, aggression, disruption, competition..I just feel its most unseemly and very unwise to mock the incumbent.. especially when you then promptly fail.
      Nigel
      • Jun 6 2017
      • Reply
      Possibly but we all know it's very easy to take these things out of context. Take this quote from your blog : "The way both Agency and Corporate recruiters ‘attract’ and find candidates is, for the most part, an unmitigated disaster, costing a fortune ... And no one seems to care or even notice!" I don't know Gen George, maybe she is a disrespectful loud-mouth youth with no understanding of the recruitment profession, although I somehow doubt it. And again if she is it does make me question why Programmed valued her fledgling company at $18m?
        Greg Savage
        • Jun 6 2017
        • Reply
        Big difference calling an entire group of people, including me, "exploitative", to me saying that they way recruiters find talent is a disaster. There is no question of 'context' here. Whats more I said "For the most part" allowing for the fact some people do it brilliantly. I stand by that statement 100% by the way One is personal and insulting, the other is talking about poor process, and I am talking about my own industry that I have been in for 4 decades! I am pretty sure you can see the difference Nigel As for the valuation of the company..that was then.. its not valued at a fraction of that now obviously, considering the write down And the world is littered with examples of people overvaluing an unproven idea..I have done it myself..the other company I mention in this article was also valued by some at a hefty premium, all that money lost now presumably. This happens everywhere. Uber might be the biggest looming example. Worth billions but loses billions.Something will have to change there. You also make a fortune getting in early on an idea that flies, so Programmed, took their risk and will either lose their money or get a great rewards All that is irrelevant anyway. I am not criticising her idea, her business, her company.I dont know the person. She may be lovely and this outburst out of character. That's why I have been only mild in my comments. I am talking about insulting people you are competing with. That's what the article is about.
          Nigel
          • Jun 6 2017
          Fair points, I don't think anyone would disagree that that exploitative was the wrong choice of words (interesting I can't find the original quote only Ross' blog post) however if you take out that word I don't see a big difference between “The recruitment industry is broken, with outdated, needlessly expensive and ineffective processes" and "The way..recruiters find candidates is, for the most part, an unmitigated disaster, costing a fortune and resulting in ‘B’ class hires". I appreciate you've been in the industry a long time but still feel calling her a disrespectful loud-mouth based on one, possibly now disowned, quote is a bit much.
          Greg Savage
          • Jun 6 2017
          The difference, Nigel , is this I have a long track record of supporting the recruitment industry and the words you quote were part of an article, which is part of a crusade, to IMPROVE and strengthen the recruitment industry.To build it up. To help. Indeed it was advice to recruiters on how to stay relevant and defend against disruption The comments I refer to in this blog were from an outsider seeking to mock, denigrate and belittle ...for commercial gain. Can you see it now? I said it already, but i will say it again. The person may in fact not be disrespectful in personality. I don't know. But these remarks most certainly were. And more so unfortunate, as events played out. I am done with this Nigel. Done my best to explain where I am at. I am not sure if you actually disagree or are just "arguing". Either way, you are entitled to your view, and thanks for reading my blog Feel free to continue commenting, and I will publish your posts, but I am out.
    Ross Clennett
    • Jun 6 2017
    • Reply
    Nigel - I quoted Gen George directly from an item posted on industry news service, ShortList, on 3 December 2013, headlined OneShift biting the hand that feeds it? The first three sentences of the ShortList article are as follows: The founder of online recruitment start-up OneShift has called on employers to boycott "exploitative" traditional recruiters, despite receiving a sizeable investment from a staffing company just two months ago. OneShift founder Gen George urged employers to fight back against an industry she claims is ripping them off, in a statement released this afternoon. "The recruitment industry is broken. It's completely exploitative, and is responsible for huge amounts of dissatisfaction on both sides of the employment equation – jobseekers and employers," she said.
      Nigel
      • Jun 6 2017
      • Reply
      Thanks for the clarification, and thank you Greg for your responses. Guess we'll just disagree on this one. Keep up the good work
Nicole
  • Jun 6 2017
  • Reply
BOOM!
Anita Ziemer
  • Jun 6 2017
  • Reply
The insecure are fortified by their hostility. Here's another 'hostility' I read on a website from a new entrant who I suspect one day, may rue their arrogance:- “The Relief of not having to deal with any Recruitment Agents - you won’t find any Agency jobs on our site!” We welcome new approaches, technologies and new players into the sector. An evolving, competitive sector is healthy. So why indeed the need for these new players to be dismissive of established service providers? Meanness is borne of small-mindedness. Slade Group is 50 years old this year and still growing up. We've invested in our brand to build relevance to talented passive and active job seekers. We invest in technology, training and live our values in showing care for our candidates - even if it's in our practice of 'rejection with dignity', as for every 100 job applicants only one might be appointed. We understand that if employers have direct access to talent through trusted sources then recruiters aren't needed. But we also know recruiting is plain hard work and we add value in many ways. We're proud to say we strive to deliver terrific hiring outcomes and often help simplify complex human resource challenges.
Craig Michilis
  • Jun 6 2017
  • Reply
Good post Greg. There are many examples of this posted by people in and close to the industry. People who should know better but like Trump tap into stereotypical views gaining herd type "likes" to their post. It's disappointing. We all need to step up. Listen to the conversation and engage with it respectively providing an alternate dialogue to the chat.
Neil Bolton
  • Jun 6 2017
  • Reply
Greg, the number of times I read a media release about how something is just absolutely wonderful and disruptive and the way the industry has to go, yet I cannot see how the business model could possibly work - well, let's just say that I rather like the traditional ways of being successful. The two companies you refer to here were, to my mind, both totally weird. And yet they gained investment. Crazy. But there are plenty more out there just as strange.
Luke
  • Jun 6 2017
  • Reply
Having just checked out the OneShift website, there seems to be a huge flaw in their business model - they let anyone post job ads. The idea is that the site connects the candidate directly with the client, cutting out the costly middleman - the recruiter, however when I performed a simple search for "Digital Marketing" jobs in Melbourne, it returned 21 results for retail and bar staff - all posted by a recruitment company! If anything, they have provided a cost effective platform for recruitment agencies to post job ads and have software match candidates based on their profile. For $1000 you can post 50 job ads for $20 an ad, which greatly undercuts posting an ad on seek. This loophole has provided the recruitment industry with another platform to source candidates, not cut the recruitment costs for clients. Kinda bitter-sweet for us recruiters really.
Simon Selkirk
  • Jun 6 2017
  • Reply
Deftly written Greg! Keep up the good work.
Ben Hutt
  • Jun 6 2017
  • Reply
Hi Greg. Thanks for the post, the sentiment of which I agree with. I'd just like to point out for completeness sake that search party's business model was designed to empower agency recruiters, by leveraging technology, to be more profitable and open up their services to a much broader customer base, expanding their market opportunity. If anything the disruption that we pursued was to work with agencies to bring agency quality service and outcomes to a mass audience, disrupting the established job board incumbents.
    Greg Savage
    • Jun 6 2017
    • Reply
    Fair comment Ben and nice to hear from you. I did not intend to tar Search Party with any negative brush regarding PR, but rather mentioned the company as evidence of how hard it is to disrupt the current recruitment model. I well remember you explaining your plans to me, and you pointing out then, as you have here, that your plan was not to replace agencies, but rather to leverage off the "under utilized data base". You will also remember no doubt some of my reservations that day. For what its worth, I thought your model clever, and while I never shared your vision for the scale it could achieve, I actually felt it would work to a certain level. I guess it might yet. Very best, Greg
Judi
  • Jun 7 2017
  • Reply
I will dare to say that so many 'disruptive' startups fail because the 20-something founders did not possess enough business knowledge or industry knowledge before they 'jumped' in with visions of grandeur. If they do not thoroughly understand the staffing industry either through experience or via an industry consultant, then of course their plan will fail. My guess is that they think that Googling and find complaints about recruiters, then they assume the industry is bad. I'm afraid too many entrepreneurs want a quick success and they think a software platform or website is what will kill it for them. I follow every recruiting or staffing startup who claims to disrupt or replace us, and I can see the same flaws. On a side note, I believe in Karma. Gen George got a visit from Karma after she bashed our industry. A former colleague of mine, laid off from both your and my former employer, decided to try to start a headhunting business that used negative marketing to try to get clients. He would blast out social/LinkedIn posts about how much of a rip fees of 20 to 30% are, etc. I told him it was going to come back to kick him. He's out of business.
Peter Horsfall
  • Jun 7 2017
  • Reply
Great to see this article bring in some long standing recruiters to debate what's important in our industry. Quality recruitment is what I hear coming through is more important for our clients. Automation does not give you a feel, vision, the sound of a candidate. Also, candidates do not put the relevant stuff on their resumes. We encourage candidates to call us. We put our phone number on our adverts. I know, old school ideas and at a cost. Engineering People talk to the applicants, we listen to them, and we ask them direct questions, engage them in engineering concepts. We maybe old school, but we enjoy our work. And our our clients enjoy the quality they get. Uneducated people may think recruiters add little value. A lot of what we do is fill in the gaps, add to what they missed out (and it is always the important bits) and qualify what words on a page mean. Juxtaposed to the benefits of what an effective fully qualified competent individual can add to a company.
Matthew Templar
  • Jun 12 2017
  • Reply
Interesting how the Sydney Herald (and NZ's Dominion Post) see the same story: http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/small-business/93509366/From-jobless-in-France-to-millionaire-by-26?cid=edm:businessday:dailybrief&bid=201794441
    Greg Savage
    • Jun 12 2017
    • Reply
    Yes, I saw that Matthew I dont know the full detail, but note the business was sold for an "undisclosed sum". Programmed is a listed compnay. Transactions like this are public if they are over a certain amount. The Programmed annual results statement say that the “purchase” did “not involve any cash” They also wrote down their initial investment by 2.1 M. That means it has declined substantially in value. One Shift have vacated their offices according to Shortlist. This story seems to base her "millionaire " status on the valuation made initially, when Programmed paid a giddy $5M for quarter of the biz, which clearly no longer applies I dont know the full inside story but it looks very much like it failed, the business was taken over by Programmed, so as to minimize losses, George was moved into a minor role. That last sentence is speculation.. but looks likely Cheers Greg
Justin Falk
  • Jun 21 2017
  • Reply
Hi Greg, it has certainly been a bloodbath of late for those in the HR & Rec Tech space. I do have to agree with Ben though. Our platform, TalentVine is not trying to eliminate recruiters, we are simply making it easier for employers to identify and work with the best recruiters in the industry. Unfortunately because of the actions of a few consultants, there is the preconceived idea in the industry that employers hate recruiters. But we know thats not the case.... They only hate the bad ones. The likes of The Search Party, TalentVine and RecFinder will only continue to provide value to great consultants and if we can use metrics and ratings to separate the best from the rubbish ones, then the so-called 'cowboys' will slowly get flushed out and surely this is better for everyone involved.
Vincent Garcia
  • Jun 23 2017
  • Reply
“The recruitment industry is broken. It’s completely exploitative, and is responsible for huge amounts of dissatisfaction on both sides of the employment equation – jobseekers and employers." I still agree on this one though I have not suite come up with a solution yet. As bold as it may sound, it somehow reflects some kind of truth on how things work. Indeed, the recruitment industry and most consultancies have been strongly impacted by the crisis (since 2008-ish). Sure, "completely exploitative" might be a bit rough around the egdes and "huge amounts of dissatisfaction" might also sound a little exagerated but I guess it's only fair enough in the Country where Marketing was born. At the end of the day, I reckon the best is yet to come ! Get ready for it ! :-)

Leave Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE SAVAGE TRUTH
SUBSCRIBE NOW
SEARCH
THE LATEST SAVAGE TRUTH
  • Three ways recruitment work gets done
  • Are your LinkedIn connections fake?
  • This recruiter killed the client meeting
  • How AI-washing is scamming recruiters
  • Selling or lying? There’s no grey

Top 20 HR Blogs 2019

The Savage Truth – Categories
Greg Savage & The Savage Truth

Greg is the founder of leading recruitment companies Firebrand Talent Search, People2People and Recruitment Solutions, and a current shareholder and director of several others, including Consult Recruitment. He is a regular keynote speaker worldwide and provides specialised advice for Recruitment, Professional Services & Social Media companies.





Sixty Savage Seconds - Competing on price is a slippery slope to recruiting hell

Previous thumb

Sixty Savage Seconds - Have YOU dumbed recruitment down?

Next thumb
Scroll
ONE SUBSCRIPTION TWO WAYS TO LEARN

Whether you’d prefer start with SRA Learner and on-demand video training LMS style, or dive straight into SRA Coach with AI enhanced advice delivered direct to your desktop in real-time, we’ve got you covered. One subscription two ways to learn.

> SRA Leaner & SRA Coach 
> How Much Does It Cost?
> SRA Course Content
> SRA Chrome Extension

RECENTLY ON THE SAVAGE TRUTH BLOG
  • Three ways recruitment work gets done
  • Are your LinkedIn connections fake?
  • This recruiter killed the client meeting
  • How AI-washing is scamming recruiters
  • Selling or lying? There’s no grey
  • Be a better recruitment leader
  • Your database is cheating on you
  • The best recruitment event in the UK?
  • Recruitment rebounds to a 3-year high
  • Your recruitment business model is dying
The Savage Recruitment Academy
Copyright The Savage Recruitment Academy 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Site By AMC Creative